IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/sscijp/v13y2010i1p53-67..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Liberal Preferences and Conservative Policies: The Puzzling Size of Japan's Welfare State

Author

Listed:
  • Shogo TAKEGAWA

Abstract

In Japan—unlike, for example, the US—the word ‘welfare’ has a positive connotation and is regularly invoked in political speech. However, despite welfare's rhetorical popularity, Japan's public expenditure on welfare programs is low compared to European nations. The Japanese government is committed to keeping welfare program outlays below a certain percentage of government revenue despite the fact that survey data show that the majority of Japanese would prefer a ‘high-benefit/high-cost’ system to the current ‘low-benefit/low-cost’ system. Which demographic groups support having a high-benefit/high-cost welfare system? In terms of gender, men are more in favor than women. Among age groups, the middle-aged are the most supportive. Looking at differences across socioeconomic groups, highly educated and well-paid white-collar workers express the strongest support. The types of welfare programs people most want to see expanded are for elder care and childcare. Given that the middle class clearly prefers expanding welfare, it should be possible to reach a national consensus on universal principles that would form the basis of a new welfare state, which is needed to replace the ad hoc and inconsistent programs of today. To achieve this consensus, the public's distrust of the tax system must be overcome.

Suggested Citation

  • Shogo TAKEGAWA, 2010. "Liberal Preferences and Conservative Policies: The Puzzling Size of Japan's Welfare State," Social Science Japan Journal, University of Tokyo and Oxford University Press, vol. 13(1), pages 53-67.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:sscijp:v:13:y:2010:i:1:p:53-67.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/ssjj/jyq007
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:sscijp:v:13:y:2010:i:1:p:53-67.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/ssjj .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.