IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/scippl/v53y2026i1p71-87..html

The evolution of environmental technologies integration in industrial knowledge bases: centrality, coherence, and convergence

Author

Listed:
  • Ana Urraca-Ruiz
  • Pedro Miranda
  • Vanessa Avanci

Abstract

This paper examines the role and evolution of environmental technologies (ETs) through centrality profiles and integration patterns within industrial knowledge bases. The findings indicate that the centrality of environmental technical fields remains stable across two periods (1978–99 and 2000–15), with ETs often occupying marginal positions due to their emerging nature. ETs that address primary environmental issues in specific industries tend to have higher centrality, while others vary based on industry focus. Regarding integration patterns, ETs exhibit coherence with central technologies and convergence with marginal ones, with integration profiles proving more dynamic than centrality profiles. This transition reflects a growing connection between ETs and industry core competencies, driven by economic value and operational cost reductions. The study recommends prioritizing ETs that align with central competencies, facilitating convergence for emerging ETs; developing industry-specific and adaptable policies, supporting high-impact technologies, cross-sectoral integration, and monitoring mechanisms to enhance ET integration, fostering sustainable development.

Suggested Citation

  • Ana Urraca-Ruiz & Pedro Miranda & Vanessa Avanci, 2026. "The evolution of environmental technologies integration in industrial knowledge bases: centrality, coherence, and convergence," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 53(1), pages 71-87.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:53:y:2026:i:1:p:71-87.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/scipol/scaf083
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:53:y:2026:i:1:p:71-87.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/spp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.