IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/scippl/v53y2026i1p32-54..html

An indicator framework for assessing innovation capabilities in the informal sector

Author

Listed:
  • Il-haam Petersen
  • Glenda Kruss
  • Nazeem Mustapha
  • Nicole van Rheede

Abstract

Increasingly, the potential of the informal sector in offering alternative development pathways is highlighted. A challenge is to understand how informal enterprises build innovation capabilities that break necessity-driven path dependencies. This paper proposes an empirically-grounded, multi-dimensional indicator framework to assess innovation capabilities in the informal sector. The research draws on a survey of 996 informal enterprises and in-depth qualitative research in South Africa. The indicator framework includes five broad dimensions: knowledge integration, institutional work, modes of innovation and learning, sophistication of innovation, and business evolution. Cluster analysis was used to empirically assess the value of the indicator framework. Four clusters of businesses were identified, distinguished by their use of symbolic knowledge and formal know-how gained through work experience, learning-by-interacting, and proactive innovation practices. The aim is to contribute to efforts towards developing indicators that broaden and open-up debate, and bring attention to an area not sufficiently covered in mainstream measurement.

Suggested Citation

  • Il-haam Petersen & Glenda Kruss & Nazeem Mustapha & Nicole van Rheede, 2026. "An indicator framework for assessing innovation capabilities in the informal sector," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 53(1), pages 32-54.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:53:y:2026:i:1:p:32-54.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/scipol/scaf087
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:53:y:2026:i:1:p:32-54.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/spp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.