IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/scippl/v53y2026i1p131-144..html

Conceptualising inclusive in inclusive innovations: evidence from the AI-based MedTech for cancer detection in India

Author

Listed:
  • Pallavi Joshi
  • Dinar Kale
  • Aravinda Meera Guntupalli
  • David Wield

Abstract

Early detection of cancers is a major challenge in India due to the limited availability and access to early detection modalities in low-resource healthcare settings. Recent artificial intelligence (AI)-driven point-of-care (PoC) medical technology (MedTech) innovations for early detection have shown some signs of bridging this gap. This article has two objectives: first, to contextualize these innovations into the broader health-industrial construct of early detection modalities for cancer in India. For this, we use our novel Inclusive Health Innovation framework to frame adaptation of the scarcity-induced innovation matrix by Srinivas and Sutz. Second, it conceptualizes inclusivity in the context of these PoC MedTechs, exploring its implications for cancer detection in India. Using three case studies of PoC MedTechs for oral, breast, and cervical cancer, and data from online semi-structured interviews, this article provides critical insights into inclusiveness in the development process and outcomes of these innovations in low-resource healthcare settings.

Suggested Citation

  • Pallavi Joshi & Dinar Kale & Aravinda Meera Guntupalli & David Wield, 2026. "Conceptualising inclusive in inclusive innovations: evidence from the AI-based MedTech for cancer detection in India," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 53(1), pages 131-144.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:53:y:2026:i:1:p:131-144.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/scipol/scaf081
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:53:y:2026:i:1:p:131-144.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/spp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.