IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/scippl/v52y2025i5p792-804..html

Mobilizing research for contextualized innovation: scarcity and urgency as drivers during Covid-19 in the South

Author

Listed:
  • Judith Sutz
  • Cecilia Tomassini
  • María Schmukler
  • Leticia Tejera

Abstract

Developing countries faced significant challenges during the Covid-19 pandemic, including severe difficulties in importing essential medical supplies and equipment. Domestic production of such devices, often based on blueprints requiring expensive resources, was constrained by widespread shortages. However, many Latin American and other Southern nations successfully mobilized their scientific communities to develop efficient, context-specific solutions to these challenges. This paper explores how conditions of urgency and scarcity acted as catalysts for innovative problem-solving. It examines three pandemic-related innovations in Uruguay by conducting comprehensive interviews with key stakeholders. By examining the lessons learned from these innovation processes, this paper contributes to public policy discussions on leveraging innovation capacities under scarcity and highlights pathways for collaborative responses to future health challenges. Additionally, it contributes to the ongoing literature debate on how to drive innovation—specifically, on directionality and transformative action—by advocating for context-specific, alternative technological solutions across different regions to achieve global health objectives.

Suggested Citation

  • Judith Sutz & Cecilia Tomassini & María Schmukler & Leticia Tejera, 2025. "Mobilizing research for contextualized innovation: scarcity and urgency as drivers during Covid-19 in the South," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 52(5), pages 792-804.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:52:y:2025:i:5:p:792-804.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/scipol/scaf020
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:52:y:2025:i:5:p:792-804.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/spp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.