IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/scippl/v52y2025i5p692-701..html

The legislative effect of ignorance: institutional risk and the regulation of new genomic techniques

Author

Listed:
  • Christian Dayé

Abstract

Recent innovations in biotechnology, above all the use of genome editing like CRISPR/Cas in plant breeding, have led authorities across the globe to question the adequacy of regulatory policies. Focusing on the situation in the European Union, this article claims that the inability to establish whether new genomic techniques (NGTs) were used in breeding a particular crop functions as the main driver behind the dawning policy changes concerning the use of NGTs in plant breeding. This ignorance takes the form of an institutional risk: as authorities are unable to execute the regulation, they are entering a regulatory impasse. Drawing a comparison to the writings of German sociologist Heinrich Popitz, who spoke of the ‘preventive effect of ignorance’, this article explores the ‘legislative effect of ignorance’ as the main driver of policy change in the NGT case and attempts to draw general conclusions for similar situations in science and innovation policy.

Suggested Citation

  • Christian Dayé, 2025. "The legislative effect of ignorance: institutional risk and the regulation of new genomic techniques," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 52(5), pages 692-701.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:52:y:2025:i:5:p:692-701.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/scipol/scaf011
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:52:y:2025:i:5:p:692-701.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/spp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.