IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/scippl/v52y2025i5p666-691..html

Unpackaging universities’ local economic impact through a systematic literature review: between fragmentation and unclear boundaries

Author

Listed:
  • M Capriolo
  • G Barbato
  • M Turri

Abstract

This paper systematizes the literature on universities’ local economic impact, using the ‘Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses’ (PRISMA) approach and bibliometric techniques to identify key aspects underlying this concept. Although the analysis identifies three essential dimensions of economic impact—Technology transfer, Human capital, and Local development—it also reveals the literature’s struggle to examine their interrelationships. Furthermore, while most scholars define local impact as regional, the literature finds also challenging to operationally define its boundaries. This paper contributes to this debate by emphasizing the importance of understanding universities’ economic impact as an interplay among various dimensions at multiple interrelated levels. It is crucial to adopt a holistic and multidisciplinary approach to formulate policies that leverage universities’ full potential as drivers of local economic growth. Additionally, we must acknowledge that local impacts often permeate multiple levels in an increasingly interconnected world, requiring a balance with the policy-driven need for clear and definite boundaries.

Suggested Citation

  • M Capriolo & G Barbato & M Turri, 2025. "Unpackaging universities’ local economic impact through a systematic literature review: between fragmentation and unclear boundaries," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 52(5), pages 666-691.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:52:y:2025:i:5:p:666-691.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/scipol/scaf007
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:52:y:2025:i:5:p:666-691.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/spp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.