IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/scippl/v52y2025i3p375-405..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Researching or researching with the public? A systematic review on knowledge co-production through citizen science

Author

Listed:
  • Siqing Yu
  • Leila Cornips
  • Trui Steen
  • Sarah Giest
  • Joep Crompvoets
  • Abbas Rajabifard
  • Jagannath Aryal
  • Tina Jukić

Abstract

In this systematic literature review using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses protocol, we analyse 211 articles to identify the commonly studied factors impacting both the scientific and social outcomes of knowledge co-production through citizen science (hereby as ‘scientific and social outcomes’). First, we notice that a similar extent of scholarly attention goes to both outcomes in the academic discourses, and both outcomes are often addressed together. Second, we identify and synthesize twenty-nine variables into three themes, citizens, project settings, and broader context, and we argue these three perspectives need to be jointly analysed to understand knowledge co-production in citizen science. Third, we draw preliminary evidence and call for further empirical evidence to study the conditions of both outcomes. Our conceptual framework informs future studies by identifying the commonly studied factors that can be associated with the social and scientific characterization of knowledge co-produced through citizen science and necessitate further empirical investigations.

Suggested Citation

  • Siqing Yu & Leila Cornips & Trui Steen & Sarah Giest & Joep Crompvoets & Abbas Rajabifard & Jagannath Aryal & Tina Jukić, 2025. "Researching or researching with the public? A systematic review on knowledge co-production through citizen science," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 52(3), pages 375-405.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:52:y:2025:i:3:p:375-405.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/scipol/scae053
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:52:y:2025:i:3:p:375-405.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/spp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.