Author
Listed:
- Leticia Ayumi Kubo Dantas
- Alexandre Dias
Abstract
In this study, we add new evidence to the literature by investigating how individual and organizational attributes relate to the intensity of academic engagement (AE) in university research laboratories. AE relies on the adoption of mechanisms of interaction between academia and the business sector, facilitating knowledge exchange and collaboration for mutual benefits. The individual attributes of laboratory coordinators corresponded to gender, academic rank, and nonacademic experience. Organizational attributes were proxied by the scale of laboratory research resources, their competence to establish links with industry, and perceived institutional support. From a sample of 240 Brazilian university laboratories, we defined a typology to discriminate laboratories in terms of the intensity with which they practice multiple AE activities. We then investigated differences in the mean vectors of variables representing individual and organizational attributes across laboratories with distinct levels of AE. The results indicated that at the individual level, only the gender of the lab heads showed an association with the intensity of AE. Compared to laboratories with minimal involvement in AE activities, the intensely engaged ones showed higher means for the number of permanent researchers, staff size, and capital stock. Among the highly engaged laboratories, we found a predominance of those with competence to prospect and attract industrial partners and those who received sufficient support from the departments to facilitate collaboration with industry. Idiosyncrasies related to the Brazilian context are discussed in light of new insights typical of a developing country.
Suggested Citation
Leticia Ayumi Kubo Dantas & Alexandre Dias, 2025.
"Academic engagement in Brazilian university laboratories,"
Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 52(3), pages 343-355.
Handle:
RePEc:oup:scippl:v:52:y:2025:i:3:p:343-355.
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:52:y:2025:i:3:p:343-355.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/spp .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.