IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/scippl/v52y2025i3p329-342..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Making responsible research and innovation meaningful in citizen science

Author

Listed:
  • Loreta Tauginienė
  • Eglė Butkevičienė
  • Barbara Heinisch
  • Luciano Massetti
  • Francesca Ugolini
  • Snežana Popov

Abstract

This study aims to explore what aspects of citizen science (CS) make the involvement of researchers (implementing CS projects) meaningful in terms of Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) principles. Using constructivist grounded theory, we analysed semi-structured interviews conducted with 20 CS projects in terms of sensemaking and sensegiving. In terms of sensemaking, researchers of CS projects tend to implicitly self-incorporate RRI principles into work and among these principles, public engagement and inclusion are key aspects motivating researchers into CS projects. In terms of sensegiving, researchers prioritize open access and science education over other RRI principles. The lack of acknowledgment of RRI’s importance in the current research culture proves to be a significant barrier to implementing these principles in a sustained manner. Likewise, experiential learning was widely practised; however, CS projects encountered different concerns and dilemmas. Therefore, tailored training on RRI is necessary for researchers involved in CS projects.

Suggested Citation

  • Loreta Tauginienė & Eglė Butkevičienė & Barbara Heinisch & Luciano Massetti & Francesca Ugolini & Snežana Popov, 2025. "Making responsible research and innovation meaningful in citizen science," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 52(3), pages 329-342.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:52:y:2025:i:3:p:329-342.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/scipol/scae078
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:52:y:2025:i:3:p:329-342.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/spp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.