IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/scippl/v52y2025i2p269-283..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The evolution of Industry 4.0 capacities across regions in EU research programmes

Author

Listed:
  • Andrea Ciffolilli
  • Antonio Lopolito
  • Alessandro Muscio
  • Alasdair Reid

Abstract

European policy supports cutting-edge research on Industry 4.0, aiming to promote excellence and ensure a balanced distribution of regional Industry 4.0 capacities. We analyse Industry 4.0 research projects financed by the European Union’s framework programmes over a 14-year period, investigating whether less developed regions benefit from interaction with more advanced regions that have a stronger capacity to diversify their Industry 4.0 technologies. We find a strong path-dependency in technological diversification between programming periods. Moreover, while national Industry 4.0 programmes negatively affect the capacity of regions to diversify technologies, possibly generating a substitution effect, we find that regional networking does not support less diversified regions in mastering multiple technologies.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrea Ciffolilli & Antonio Lopolito & Alessandro Muscio & Alasdair Reid, 2025. "The evolution of Industry 4.0 capacities across regions in EU research programmes," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 52(2), pages 269-283.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:52:y:2025:i:2:p:269-283.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/scipol/scae077
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:52:y:2025:i:2:p:269-283.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/spp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.