IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/scippl/v52y2025i2p222-235..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The study of policy coordination: an approach to integrate expert assessment with automated content analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Stijn Kelchtermans
  • Anabela M Santos

Abstract

Public policy scholars have long agreed that the coordination of policies involving different authorities and policy frameworks is challenging. This paper responds to recent calls to explore new empirical methods for studying policy coordination by integrating automated text analysis into the workflow of human experts. A key contribution of our approach is a quantitative indicator of the semantic alignment between different policy objectives. We critically review the performance of the indicator in terms of its ability to assess both horizontal and vertical policy coordination by analysing the Recovery and Resilience Plan (2021–26) and the national and regional Smart Specialization Strategies (2021–27) in Portugal. Based on this exercise, we reflect on the necessary conditions for the successful implementation of automated text analysis of policy documents as well as its potential in other empirical settings.

Suggested Citation

  • Stijn Kelchtermans & Anabela M Santos, 2025. "The study of policy coordination: an approach to integrate expert assessment with automated content analysis," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 52(2), pages 222-235.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:52:y:2025:i:2:p:222-235.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/scipol/scae074
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:52:y:2025:i:2:p:222-235.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/spp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.