IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/scippl/v52y2025i2p193-206..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The innovation–inclusion nexus in countries of Latin America: foresight for shaping new policy approaches

Author

Listed:
  • Carlos Aguirre-Bastos
  • Isabel Bortagaray
  • K Matthias Weber

Abstract

Latin America improved poverty and inequity conditions in the past decades. Despite such progress and the adoption of new policies, inclusive development remains a major challenge. To attain inclusive development, it is crucial to advance toward renewed policies that explicitly include transformative innovation and close existing gaps in the innovation–inclusion nexus. Foresight promises to help bridge such gaps, but the practice of literature on addressing this role is scarce. For our analysis, we adopt a three-level conceptual and analytical framework, focusing on (1) the evolution of policies for inclusive development; (2) the evolution of research and innovation policy approaches to inclusive development; and (3) the extent to which foresight has been used in underpinning a more systemic policy approach. Using this framework, we examine the situation of four Latin American countries that adopted different approaches to innovation and inclusive development and discuss the potential of foresight to contribute to policies that effectively address the innovation–inclusion nexus.

Suggested Citation

  • Carlos Aguirre-Bastos & Isabel Bortagaray & K Matthias Weber, 2025. "The innovation–inclusion nexus in countries of Latin America: foresight for shaping new policy approaches," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 52(2), pages 193-206.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:52:y:2025:i:2:p:193-206.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/scipol/scae075
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:52:y:2025:i:2:p:193-206.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/spp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.