IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/scippl/v51y2024i1p89-107..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Understanding career transitions of applied researchers to universities: evidence from Germany

Author

Listed:
  • Cecilia Garcia Chavez
  • David Howoldt
  • Patrick Hoyer
  • Maria Karaulova
  • Henning Kroll
  • Torben Schubert

Abstract

This paper analyses the conditions and factors influencing non-university researchers’ career transitions back into academia. Using affiliation data in publications of German researchers, their cross-sector career transitions from the public research organisation Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft and industry to universities are analysed. Although the rate of transitions is small, there are distinctive windows of opportunity at a junior career stage, especially for Fraunhofer researchers. Researchers who publish more and in more acclaimed journals, Fraunhofer researchers who co-publish with universities, and women are more likely to gain a university affiliation over the course of their career. These results indicate the influence of institutional proximity for cross-domain career transitions. The quality and impact of academic knowledge could be improved if the higher education sector was more open to recruitment of researchers from other sectors. Policy needs to target the barriers that preclude applied researchers from pursuing university careers.

Suggested Citation

  • Cecilia Garcia Chavez & David Howoldt & Patrick Hoyer & Maria Karaulova & Henning Kroll & Torben Schubert, 2024. "Understanding career transitions of applied researchers to universities: evidence from Germany," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 51(1), pages 89-107.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:51:y:2024:i:1:p:89-107.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/scipol/scad049
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:51:y:2024:i:1:p:89-107.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/spp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.