IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/scippl/v51y2024i1p1-14..html

Universities of applied sciences’ EU research project participation through the lens of differentiation

Author

Listed:
  • Marco Cavallaro

Abstract

In European universities of applied sciences (UASs), the intensity of research activities and the level of differentiation from universities vary across countries. We investigate whether the differentiation in the research function of UASs is reflected in their participation in the European Union Framework Programs for Research and Innovation (EU-FPs). We focus on the current and former UASs in four higher education systems with distinct levels of differentiation—the UK, Norway, Switzerland, and the Netherlands. Our results show significant cross-country differences in the intensity and type of EU-FP projects acquired. The former UASs in the UK and Norway had a participation profile similar to that of universities. In more differentiated higher education systems, Swiss and Dutch UASs were more geared toward applied projects. Variations both across and within countries emphasize the importance of research capacities. Our results carry implications for how national and European authorities can foster UAS participation in EU-FPs.

Suggested Citation

  • Marco Cavallaro, 2024. "Universities of applied sciences’ EU research project participation through the lens of differentiation," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 51(1), pages 1-14.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:51:y:2024:i:1:p:1-14.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/scipol/scad048
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xi Xiong & Shan-na Wu & Xian-tong Ren, 2025. "Unveiling the Research Efficiency and Improvement Paths of Chinese Elite Universities: A Comparative Analysis," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 16(5), pages 16283-16311, November.
    2. Kris Boudt & Yanick Inghels & André Spithoven, 2025. "Mapping Economic Growth and Employment in EU-Funded Research Projects: Trac(k)ing the SDG 8 Trajectory," De Economist, Springer, vol. 173(1), pages 245-275, March.
    3. Anna Rita Dipierro & Pierluigi Toma, 2025. "Research and third mission efficiency in UK universities: assessing the role of European Framework Programmes," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 130(12), pages 7271-7291, December.
    4. Klincewicz, Krzysztof & Esmaeil Zaei, Mansour, 2025. "The effects of investments in research infrastructures of higher education institutes: Evidence from Poland and Czechia," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(10).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:51:y:2024:i:1:p:1-14.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/spp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.