IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/scippl/v50y2023i5p881-892..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Responding to uncertainty in the COVID-19 pandemic: perspectives from Bavaria, Germany

Author

Listed:
  • Amelia Fiske
  • Johannes Lange
  • Alena Buyx
  • Stuart McLennan

Abstract

The 2019 novel coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic has created unprecedented challenges for policymakers and scientific experts charged with preventing the spread of the virus. In upending the usual mechanisms for political deliberation, the pandemic offers a window into the co-production of governmental policy decisions and scientific evidence. Taking the German state of Bavaria as a case study, this article draws on expert interviews with individuals directly involved in high-level pandemic decision-making to explore the changing relationships between policymakers and scientific experts. The challenges that emerged in the Bavarian context illustrate that while uncertainty has long been understood as constitutive of scientific knowledge, it became a stumbling block for policymakers due to newfound degrees of urgency and implications of decision-making in relation to the pandemic. In order to better address the emergent, evolving problems posed by public health crises, uncertainty must also be understood as formative in the work of policy.

Suggested Citation

  • Amelia Fiske & Johannes Lange & Alena Buyx & Stuart McLennan, 2023. "Responding to uncertainty in the COVID-19 pandemic: perspectives from Bavaria, Germany," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 50(5), pages 881-892.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:50:y:2023:i:5:p:881-892.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/scipol/scad031
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:50:y:2023:i:5:p:881-892.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/spp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.