IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/scippl/v50y2023i4p579-590..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Observable and unobservable causes of the gender gap in S&T funding for young researchers

Author

Listed:
  • Diana Suarez
  • Florencia Fiorentin
  • Mariano Pereira

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to study the relationship between academic performance, gender, and science and technology grants. The empirical analysis is based on the Argentinean Fund for Scientific and Technological Research ‘Scientific and Technological Research Projects’ (FONCYT-PICT). The methodology is based on a multivariate decomposition for non-linear response models, an extension of the Oaxaca–Blinder decomposition. Results confirm the presence of a gender gap. Women have lower probabilities of being awarded with funds than men, even when academic trajectories are alike. Results show that even if the productivity gap is closed, men’s and women’s trajectories are differently valued against women, and this negatively impacts their probability of being awarded. Therefore, even if women manage to publish more and—somehow—be more cited, the gap will persist. Explicit public policy measures are required to close the current gap and stop reproducing it.

Suggested Citation

  • Diana Suarez & Florencia Fiorentin & Mariano Pereira, 2023. "Observable and unobservable causes of the gender gap in S&T funding for young researchers," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 50(4), pages 579-590.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:50:y:2023:i:4:p:579-590.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/scipol/scad008
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:50:y:2023:i:4:p:579-590.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/spp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.