IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/scippl/v49y2022i4p632-642..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Factors enabling social impact: The importance of institutional entrepreneurship in social science research
[Institutional Entrepreneurship and Organizational Innovation: The Start-Up of a Divergent New Venture at the Periphery of a Mature Field]

Author

Listed:
  • Emanuela Reale

Abstract

This paper wants to shed light on organizational factors as conditions for the impact of academic research in social sciences. Organizations play a role as enablers of social impact, providing conditions that improve the probability of impacting on society. We try to ascertain whether this role is supported and stimulated through institutional entrepreneurship, changing the institutions’ organizational features, ideas, and beliefs to increase productive interactions and knowledge translation. Our work centres on exploring the actors’ social position and their ability to introduce changes that are likely to permanently engage the organizations in the pursuit of social impact and possibly support it in the long run. The empirical basis consists of three case studies about research projects in the social sciences, which brought together academic researchers from different universities and stakeholders. The analysis demonstrates that understanding impact requires adopting a broader perspective, considering also the transformations emerging at the organizational level.

Suggested Citation

  • Emanuela Reale, 2022. "Factors enabling social impact: The importance of institutional entrepreneurship in social science research [Institutional Entrepreneurship and Organizational Innovation: The Start-Up of a Divergen," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 49(4), pages 632-642.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:49:y:2022:i:4:p:632-642.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/scipol/scac014
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:49:y:2022:i:4:p:632-642.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/spp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.