IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/scippl/v49y2022i2p268-288..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Making university and industry research collaboration: Evidence from co-inventions in Japan
[Endogenous Matching and the Empirical Determinants of Contract Form]

Author

Listed:
  • Junichi Nishimura
  • Sadao Nagaoka
  • Shinichi Akaike
  • Mitsuaki Hosono

Abstract

This paper examines the making of university and industry research collaboration from the perspective of matching theory. Our analysis, based on an original survey in Japan, aims at identifying the mechanism of matching. The major findings are as follows. There is significant evidence for positive assortative matching at the project level: a researcher with better seeds or better needs gives a higher value to the partner’s research capability and the goodness-of-fit between the project and the partner’s capability in selecting its partner. The projects with the partners selected for research capability and goodness-of-fit are associated with high university and industry research collaboration performance. Furthermore, own contact is most used for positive assortative matching. These results indicate the importance of deep field knowledge and tacit knowledge of the researcher in the search process. These findings suggest that technology transfer policy would need to pay significant attention to the contribution of the decentralized matching process.

Suggested Citation

  • Junichi Nishimura & Sadao Nagaoka & Shinichi Akaike & Mitsuaki Hosono, 2022. "Making university and industry research collaboration: Evidence from co-inventions in Japan [Endogenous Matching and the Empirical Determinants of Contract Form]," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 49(2), pages 268-288.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:49:y:2022:i:2:p:268-288.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/scipol/scab079
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:49:y:2022:i:2:p:268-288.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/spp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.