IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/scippl/v48y2021i5p679-696..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The value priorities of consumer innovators

Author

Listed:
  • Helle Alsted Søndergaard
  • John Thøgersen

Abstract

Contributing to the understanding of drivers for innovation, we report the first study of the value base of consumer innovation. Based on a survey with representative samples across ten European countries (N ≈ 10,000), about 5 per cent of participants are engaged in innovation activities in their leisure time, which is in line with earlier, single-country studies. The study confirms that consumer innovation is significantly related to personal value priorities and as expected, consumer innovators give higher priority to openness-to-change values than non-innovators. More surprisingly, consumer innovators are less motivated by hedonistic goals (fun and enjoyment) and more by concern for other people and society (i.e. self-transcendence values) than non-innovators. This adds an important dimension to existing knowledge and understanding of what motivates consumer innovation, helps differentiate consumer innovators from other consumers, and offers important input to the development of policies for facilitating or supporting consumer innovation.

Suggested Citation

  • Helle Alsted Søndergaard & John Thøgersen, 2021. "The value priorities of consumer innovators," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 48(5), pages 679-696.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:48:y:2021:i:5:p:679-696.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/scipol/scab040
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:48:y:2021:i:5:p:679-696.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/spp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.