IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/scippl/v48y2021i4p499-507..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Making a Research Infrastructure: Conditions and Strategies to Transform a Service into an Infrastructure

Author

Listed:
  • Benedikt Fecher
  • Rebecca Kahn
  • Nataliia Sokolovska
  • Teresa Völker
  • Philip Nebe

Abstract

In this article, we examine the making of research infrastructures for digital research. In line with many scholars in this field, we understand research infrastructures as deeply relational and adaptive systems that are embedded in research practice. Our aim was to identify the relevant context factors, actor constellations, organizational settings, and strategies which contribute to the evolution of a basic service into an actual infrastructure. To this end, we conducted thirty-three case studies of non-commercial and commercial research services along the research life cycle. By examining how these services emerge, we hope to gain a better understanding of the conditions and strategies to transform a service into an infrastructure. We are able to identify competitive disadvantages for publicly financed infrastructure projects with regard to the mode of implementation and the resources invested in development and marketing. We suggest that the results of this study are of practical relevance, especially for individuals, communities, and organizations wanting to create research infrastructures, as well as for funders and policy makers wanting to support innovative and sustainable infrastructures.

Suggested Citation

  • Benedikt Fecher & Rebecca Kahn & Nataliia Sokolovska & Teresa Völker & Philip Nebe, 2021. "Making a Research Infrastructure: Conditions and Strategies to Transform a Service into an Infrastructure," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 48(4), pages 499-507.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:48:y:2021:i:4:p:499-507.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/scipol/scab026
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:48:y:2021:i:4:p:499-507.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/spp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.