IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/scippl/v48y2021i2p212-225..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The credibility of research impact statements: A new analysis of REF with Semantic Hypergraphs

Author

Listed:
  • Andrea Bonaccorsi
  • Nicola Melluso
  • Filippo Chiarello
  • Gualtiero Fantoni

Abstract

When asked to demonstrate the impact of their research, researchers build up statements that have a causal structure. However, as these statements have by nature a historical dimension, their credibility is under question. Historical statements have a genuine causal power only under certain conditions. We derive these conditions from the theory of historical causality and apply them to impact statements in two Medicine and Engineering (STEM) and Social Sciences and Humanities (SSH) areas of Research Excellence Framework. We then process the corpus with a novel text mining methodology called Semantic Hypergraphs. We identify the causal structure of statements and find that it is similar between STEM and SSH, but SSH makes systematically use of a larger number of actors. Making credible statements are more difficult in SSH than in STEM. We derive the policy implications for impact assessment and research policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrea Bonaccorsi & Nicola Melluso & Filippo Chiarello & Gualtiero Fantoni, 2021. "The credibility of research impact statements: A new analysis of REF with Semantic Hypergraphs," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 48(2), pages 212-225.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:48:y:2021:i:2:p:212-225.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/scipol/scab008
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yaqub, Ohid & Malkov, Dmitry & Siepel, Josh, 2022. "How unpredictable is research impact? Evidence from the UK’s Research Excellence Framework," SocArXiv qw873, Center for Open Science.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:48:y:2021:i:2:p:212-225.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/spp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.