IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/scippl/v46y2019i2p264-274..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Expert assessment as a framing exercise: The controversy over green macroalgal blooms’ proliferation in France

Author

Listed:
  • Magalie Bourblanc

Abstract

This article contributes to unraveling the ‘paradox of scientific authority’, that is, the fact that despite the loss of authority of scientific expertise, policymakers still resort to expert advice. Re-examining the role ascribed to expert assessment in the policy-making process in controversial contexts in particular, the article succeeds in demonstrating that one of the crucial roles of expert evaluation is to establish a more compelling definition of the problem to be dealt with by policymakers. Taking the scientific controversy surrounding the proliferation of green algal bloom on Brittany beaches (France) as a case in point, I show that expert assessment conceived as a framing exercise is, however, a two-way process: it is as much about framing for the sake of settling an expert dispute with sound scientific categories than about solving public problems in a sufficiently consensual way, taking into account the distribution of power more generally in society.

Suggested Citation

  • Magalie Bourblanc, 2019. "Expert assessment as a framing exercise: The controversy over green macroalgal blooms’ proliferation in France," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 46(2), pages 264-274.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:46:y:2019:i:2:p:264-274.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/scipol/scy056
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gabrielle Bouleau & Rémi Barbier & Marie-Pierre Halm-Lemeille & Bruno Tassin & Arnaud Buchs & Florence Habets, 2020. "Despite great expectations in the Seine River Basin, the WFD did not reduce diffuse pollution," Post-Print halshs-02957812, HAL.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:46:y:2019:i:2:p:264-274.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/spp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.