IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/scippl/v44y2017i6p753-762..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Projecting and producing ‘usefulness’ of biomedical research infrastructures; or why the Singapore Tissue Network closed

Author

Listed:
  • Erik Aarden

Abstract

This article investigates why the Singapore Tissue Network (STN) was closed, despite the government’s continued interest in the economic potential of biomedical research, to which this repository had been expected to contribute. This article engages with the STN as a research infrastructure that was designed to serve Singapore’s sociotechnical imaginary of economic development based on technological advancement, but did not align with practitioners’ views of how tissue storage contributes to knowledge making. By exploring tensions around the collection of tissue, exchange, and value in the STN, this article proposes that projections of usefulness onto the collected materials conflicted with practitioners’ perspective on the production of usefulness through engagement with these materials. This discrepancy points to the tensions between imaginaries of the purposes of tissue collection in research practice and science policy, raising the question how different perspectives on how to make research infrastructures useful may be aligned.

Suggested Citation

  • Erik Aarden, 2017. "Projecting and producing ‘usefulness’ of biomedical research infrastructures; or why the Singapore Tissue Network closed," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 44(6), pages 753-762.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:44:y:2017:i:6:p:753-762.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/scipol/scx010
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Melanie Goisauf & Gillian Martin & Heidi Beate Bentzen & Isabelle Budin-Ljøsne & Lars Ursin & Anna Durnová & Liis Leitsalu & Katharine Smith & Sara Casati & Marialuisa Lavitrano & Deborah Mascalzoni &, 2019. "Data in question: A survey of European biobank professionals on ethical, legal and societal challenges of biobank research," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(9), pages 1-22, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:44:y:2017:i:6:p:753-762.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/spp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.