IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/scippl/v44y2017i4p598-598..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The perceived impact of four funding streams on academic research production in Nordic countries: the perspectives of system actors†

Author

Listed:
  • Olivier Bégin-Caouette
  • Evanthia Kalpazidou Schmidt
  • Cynthia C. Field

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Olivier Bégin-Caouette & Evanthia Kalpazidou Schmidt & Cynthia C. Field, 2017. "The perceived impact of four funding streams on academic research production in Nordic countries: the perspectives of system actors†," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 44(4), pages 598-598.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:44:y:2017:i:4:p:598-598.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/scipol/scx025
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Huňady Ján & Pisár Peter & Jošić Hrvoje & Žmuk Berislav & Bach Mirjana Pejić, 2023. "Government and Business Funding of Sources of Funds for R&D at Universities: Complements or Substitutes?," South East European Journal of Economics and Business, Sciendo, vol. 18(2), pages 97-111, December.
    2. Belén Álvarez-Bornstein & Adrián A. Díaz-Faes & María Bordons, 2019. "What characterises funded biomedical research? Evidence from a basic and a clinical domain," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 119(2), pages 805-825, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:44:y:2017:i:4:p:598-598.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/spp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.