IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/scippl/v37y2010i9p719-722.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Hallmarks of an effective non-governmental organisation: the formation and management of Australia's Wentworth Group

Author

Listed:
  • Jerome K Vanclay

Abstract

Australia's Wentworth Group of Concerned Scientists has been highly effective in advancing policy solutions for Australia's land, water and biodiversity. The success of this group relies not only on high-profile individuals and clear communication, but also on organizational support and influential connections. The group's influence was maximized because membership was carefully selected, well-funded, and skillfully managed by a full-time campaign manager who was well-connected to key media and political decision-makers. This article offers evidence countering the emerging popular view that the Wentworth Group was spontaneous, and it offers lessons for other environmental NGOs seeking to influence government policy. Copyright , Beech Tree Publishing.

Suggested Citation

  • Jerome K Vanclay, 2010. "Hallmarks of an effective non-governmental organisation: the formation and management of Australia's Wentworth Group," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 37(9), pages 719-722, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:37:y:2010:i:9:p:719-722
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.3152/030234210X12835083817252
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:37:y:2010:i:9:p:719-722. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/spp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.