IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/scippl/v36y2009i10p743-752.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Indicator development as ‘boundary spanning’ between scientists and policy-makers

Author

Listed:
  • Helga Pülzl
  • Ewald Rametsteiner

Abstract

In sustainability impact assessments the development of widely accepted indicators that structure the subject area and provide the framework for assessing sustainability impacts is clearly important. We argue that the development of sustainability indicators in science-based initiatives works across the science/policy interface where social and natural scientists as well as stakeholders and policy-makers both translate concepts and ideas to each other and thus make value judgments about the selection of indicators and related sub-classes. This explains why pure scientific indicator initiatives based on simple ‘knowledge transfer’ models are unlikely to succeed. Instead, sustainability indicator development requires a ‘knowledge transaction model’ which spans the boundary between the scientific and the political domains. Copyright , Beech Tree Publishing.

Suggested Citation

  • Helga Pülzl & Ewald Rametsteiner, 2009. "Indicator development as ‘boundary spanning’ between scientists and policy-makers," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 36(10), pages 743-752, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:36:y:2009:i:10:p:743-752
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.3152/030234209X481987
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:36:y:2009:i:10:p:743-752. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/spp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.