IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/scippl/v35y2008i4p277-288.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The political coordination of knowledge and innovation policies in Switzerland

Author

Listed:
  • Thomas Griessen
  • Dietmar Braun

Abstract

The article highlights the main problems Switzerland faces in engaging in a more encompassing knowledge and innovation policy, an objective that is widely shared by the political elites. Two ‘coordination gaps’ are highlighted in the context of Switzerland: the ‘federal divide’ that structures political governance in the knowledge space in manifold ways and the ‘utilitarian divide’ that is institutionalised within the federal administration. It is demonstrated that Swiss policy-makers have taken great pains to overcome the obstacles in the wake of the federal divide with some success, but have failed to do so with regard to the utilitarian divide. The lack of guiding and reflexive capacities at the cabinet level will make it difficult to overcome this divide in the future, though planned reforms at the agency level may help to build some bridges between at least basic and technological research. Copyright , Beech Tree Publishing.

Suggested Citation

  • Thomas Griessen & Dietmar Braun, 2008. "The political coordination of knowledge and innovation policies in Switzerland," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 35(4), pages 277-288, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:35:y:2008:i:4:p:277-288
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.3152/030234208X310338
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zeyu Wang & Yachao Xiong & Changli Zhang, 2024. "Quantitative Evaluation of Eco-Environmental Protection Policy in the Yangtze River Economic Belt: A PMC-Index Model Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-25, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:35:y:2008:i:4:p:277-288. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/spp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.