IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/rfinst/v38y2025i9p2718-2758..html

Political Sentiment and Innovation: Evidence from Patenters

Author

Listed:
  • Joseph Engelberg
  • Runjing Lu
  • William Mullins
  • Richard Townsend

Abstract

We document political sentiment effects on U.S. inventors. Democratic inventors are more likely to patent (relative to Republicans) after the 2008 election of Obama but less likely after the 2016 election of Trump. These effects are at least twice as strong among politically active Democrats and are present even within firms and within firm x technology. We also show that partisans tend to cluster in technologies (e.g., Democrats in Biotechnology and Republicans in Weapons), so that sentiment effects aggregate to more patents in the technologies dominated by the winning party.

Suggested Citation

  • Joseph Engelberg & Runjing Lu & William Mullins & Richard Townsend, 2025. "Political Sentiment and Innovation: Evidence from Patenters," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 38(9), pages 22718-22758.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:rfinst:v:38:y:2025:i:9:p:2718-2758.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/rfs/hhaf029
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:rfinst:v:38:y:2025:i:9:p:2718-2758.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sfsssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.