IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/rfinst/v38y2025i9p2602-2651..html

Learning to Disclose: Disclosure Dynamics in the 1890s Streetcar Industry

Author

Listed:
  • Thomas Bourveau
  • Matthias Breuer
  • Robert Stoumbos

Abstract

We study the influence of bounded rationality on companies’ disclosure to investors in new industries. Using a historical example of a new industry, we document that several companies initially withheld their earnings, despite external capital needs and investor information demands. However, almost all these companies started disclosing shortly thereafter. Interpreted through the lens of a disclosure model featuring level- thinking, these patterns suggest that limited strategic thinking of some companies contributed to the initial failure to disclose, while feedback and learning over time contributed to the quick convergence to an equilibrium of (almost) full disclosure in the new industry.

Suggested Citation

  • Thomas Bourveau & Matthias Breuer & Robert Stoumbos, 2025. "Learning to Disclose: Disclosure Dynamics in the 1890s Streetcar Industry," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 38(9), pages 2602-2651.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:rfinst:v:38:y:2025:i:9:p:2602-2651.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/rfs/hhaf033
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:rfinst:v:38:y:2025:i:9:p:2602-2651.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sfsssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.