IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/rfinst/v33y2020i8p3804-3853..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Stock Market Rumors and Credibility

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel Schmidt
  • Itay Goldstein

Abstract

Stock prices occasionally move in response to unverified rumors. I propose a cheap talk model in which a rumormonger’s incentives to tell the truth depend on the interaction between her investment horizon and the information acquisition decisions of message-receiving investors. The model’s key prediction is that short investment horizons can facilitate credible information sharing between investors, thereby accelerating the information capitalization into market prices. Analyzing a data set of takeover rumors covered by U.S. newspapers, I find suggestive evidence in support of this prediction.Authors have furnished an Internet Appendix, which is available on the Oxford University Press Web site next to the link to the final published paper online.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel Schmidt & Itay Goldstein, 2020. "Stock Market Rumors and Credibility," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 33(8), pages 3804-3853.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:rfinst:v:33:y:2020:i:8:p:3804-3853.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/rfs/hhz120
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zin Yau Heng & Henry Leung, 2023. "The role of option‐based information on StockTwits, options trading volume, and stock returns," Journal of Futures Markets, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(8), pages 1091-1125, August.
    2. Neukirchen, Daniel & Engelhardt, Nils & Krause, Miguel & Posch, Peter N., 2023. "The value of (private) investor relations during the COVID-19 crisis," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    3. Andres, Christian & Bazhutov, Dmitry & Cumming, Douglas J. & Limbach, Peter, 2021. "Does Speculative News Hurt Productivity? Evidence from Takeover Rumors," CFR Working Papers 21-02, University of Cologne, Centre for Financial Research (CFR), revised 2021.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:rfinst:v:33:y:2020:i:8:p:3804-3853.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sfsssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.