IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/rfinst/v32y2019i6p2179-2224..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analyst Career Concerns, Effort Allocation, and Firms’ Information Environment

Author

Listed:
  • Jarrad Harford
  • Feng Jiang
  • Rong Wang
  • Fei Xie

Abstract

Analysts strategically allocate more effort to portfolio firms that are relatively more important to their careers. Thus, the other firms the analysts cover indirectly affect a firm’s information environment. Controlling for analyst and firm characteristics, we find that an analyst makes more accurate, frequent, and informative earnings forecasts and recommendations for firms ranked higher within her portfolio based on proxies for importance to institutions. A firm’s relative rank widely varies across analysts, but its information environment improves when a larger proportion of analysts consider it to be relatively important. Analysts experience more favorable career outcomes when strategically allocating their efforts. Received August 23, 2017; editorial decision June 27, 2018 by Editor Lauren Cohen. Authors have furnished an Internet Appendix, which is available on the Oxford University Press Web site next to the link to the final published paper online.

Suggested Citation

  • Jarrad Harford & Feng Jiang & Rong Wang & Fei Xie, 2019. "Analyst Career Concerns, Effort Allocation, and Firms’ Information Environment," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 32(6), pages 2179-2224.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:rfinst:v:32:y:2019:i:6:p:2179-2224.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/rfs/hhy101
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nianhang Xu & Nian Li & Rongrong Xie & Kam C. Chan, 2022. "The power of the market over government officials: Evidence from an anticorruption campaign in China," Financial Management, Financial Management Association International, vol. 51(4), pages 995-1030, December.
    2. Al Guindy, Mohamed, 2021. "Corporate Twitter use and cost of equity capital," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    3. Liu, Guangqiang & Liu, Tianbao, 2022. "Does individual investors’ dividend tax influence analyst forecast? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 50(C).
    4. Xu Cheng & Dongmin Kong & Xinwei Zheng & Qi Tang, 2022. "Do foreign investors crowd out sell‐side analysts? Evidence from China," The Financial Review, Eastern Finance Association, vol. 57(4), pages 815-834, November.
    5. Yusoff, Iliyas & Chen, Chen & Lai, Karen & Naiker, Vic & Wang, Jun, 2023. "Foreign exchange exposure and analysts’ earnings forecasts," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    6. Fee, C Edward & Li, Zhi & Peng, Qiyuan, 2023. "Hidden Gems: Do market participants respond to performance expectations revealed in compensation disclosures?," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 75(1).
    7. Du, Mengqiao, 2023. "Locked-in at home: The gender difference in analyst forecasts after the COVID-19 school closures," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 76(1).
    8. Luong, Thanh Son & Qiu, Buhui & Wu, Yi (Ava), 2021. "Does it pay to be socially connected with wall street brokerages? Evidence from cost of equity," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    9. Rösch, Dominik M. & Subrahmanyam, Avanidhar & van Dijk, Mathijs A., 2022. "Investor short-termism and real investment," Journal of Financial Markets, Elsevier, vol. 59(PB).
    10. Peter F. Pope & Tong Wang, 2023. "Analyst ability and research effort: non-EPS forecast provision as a research quality signal," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 28(3), pages 1263-1315, September.
    11. Petya Platikanova, 2023. "The Real Effects of Analyst Research Quality: Evidence from the Adoption of the Broker Protocol," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 33(3), pages 237-261, September.
    12. Le, Thanh Dat & Trinh, Tri, 2022. "Distracted analysts and earnings management," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 49(C).
    13. Kong, Dongmin & Ji, Mianmian & Liu, Shasha, 2022. "Does the mandatory disclosure of audit information affect analysts' information acquisition?," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    14. Bingxu Fang & Ole-Kristian Hope & Zhongwei Huang & Rucsandra Moldovan, 2020. "The effects of MiFID II on sell-side analysts, buy-side analysts, and firms," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 855-902, September.
    15. Xu, Limin & Yu, Chia-Feng (Jeffrey) & Zurbruegg, Ralf, 2020. "The benefit of being a local leader: Evidence from firm-specific stock price crash risk," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    16. William C Gerken & Marcus O Painter & Itay Goldstein, 2023. "The Value of Differing Points of View: Evidence from Financial Analysts’ Geographic Diversity," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 36(2), pages 409-449.
    17. Li, Fengfei & Lin, Chen & Lin, Tse-Chun, 2021. "Salient anchor and analyst recommendation downgrade," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    18. Chen, Xin, 2021. "Lunar eclipses, analyst sentiment, and earnings forecasts: Evidence from China," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 1007-1024.
    19. Blankespoor, Elizabeth & deHaan, Ed & Marinovic, Iván, 2020. "Disclosure processing costs, investors’ information choice, and equity market outcomes: A review," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(2).
    20. Brian Gibbons & Peter Iliev & Jonathan Kalodimos, 2021. "Analyst Information Acquisition via EDGAR," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(2), pages 769-793, February.
    21. Wu, Wenxin & Xu, Minya & Zhou, Zixun, 2023. "Targeted poverty alleviation disclosure and analyst forecast accuracy: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    22. Chen, Haosi (Chelsea) & Puckett, Andy, 2023. "Do Hedge Funds Value Sell-Side Analysts Differently?," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:rfinst:v:32:y:2019:i:6:p:2179-2224.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sfsssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.