IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/rfinst/v27y2014i3p881-922..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Speculation and Hedging in Segmented Markets

Author

Listed:
  • Itay Goldstein
  • Yan Li
  • Liyan Yang

Abstract

We analyze a model in which traders have different trading opportunities and learn information from prices. The difference in trading opportunities implies that different traders may have different trading motives when trading in the same market—some trade for speculation and others for hedging—and thus they may respond to the same information in opposite directions. This implies that adding more informed traders may reduce price informativeness and therefore provides a source for learning complementarities leading to multiple equilibria and price jumps. Our model is relevant to various realistic settings and helps to understand a variety of modern financial markets.

Suggested Citation

  • Itay Goldstein & Yan Li & Liyan Yang, 2014. "Speculation and Hedging in Segmented Markets," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 27(3), pages 881-922.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:rfinst:v:27:y:2014:i:3:p:881-922.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/rfs/hht059
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:rfinst:v:27:y:2014:i:3:p:881-922.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sfsssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.