IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/revage/v12y1990i2p197-206..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Evaluation of Differences between Cash and Accrual Income for Illinois Farms

Author

Listed:
  • Scott M. Newport
  • David A. Lins

Abstract

Net farm income is a measure of farm financial performance frequently used by farmers, leaders, and financial consultants. However, distortions may arise if cash income is used to measure performance. Results of this study suggest large differences between cash and accrual measures of net farm income and these differences vary by farm type, size, level of growth and degree of financial stress. Tax savings due to the cash method are also found to be large, especially on farms undergoing expansion.

Suggested Citation

  • Scott M. Newport & David A. Lins, 1990. "An Evaluation of Differences between Cash and Accrual Income for Illinois Farms," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 12(2), pages 197-206.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:revage:v:12:y:1990:i:2:p:197-206.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/aepp/12.2.197
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:revage:v:12:y:1990:i:2:p:197-206.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press or Christopher F. Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.