IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/refreg/v3y2017i2p262-279..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Capital Markets Union for a Divided Europe

Author

Listed:
  • Danny Busch

Abstract

The European Commission wishes to create fully integrated European capital markets. The Capital Markets Union (CMU) is intended to make it easier for lenders and borrowers to come into contact with one another within Europe, especially across borders. This is regardless of whether it is arranged through the intermediary of a bank, through the capital markets, or through alternative channels such as crowdfunding. In addition, more non-bank funding will help to lessen dependence on the traditional banking industry and enhance the ability to cope with economic shocks. But will the measures announced in the CMU Action Plan be sufficient to achieve an integrated European capital market? And is the CMU Action Plan still realistic if London, Europe’s financial heart, no longer participates? Moreover, what impact will the Trump administration and the victory of Emmanuel Macron have on the CMU project? This article takes a critical look at the main aspects of the CMU Action Plan.

Suggested Citation

  • Danny Busch, 2017. "A Capital Markets Union for a Divided Europe," Journal of Financial Regulation, Oxford University Press, vol. 3(2), pages 262-279.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:refreg:v:3:y:2017:i:2:p:262-279.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/jfr/fjx002
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    CMU; Trump; Brexit; Macron;
    All these keywords.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:refreg:v:3:y:2017:i:2:p:262-279.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/jfr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.