IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/rcorpf/v14y2025i3p804-838..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Shareholder-Creditor Conflict and the Resolution of Financial Distress

Author

Listed:
  • Yongqiang Chu
  • Ha Diep-Nguyen
  • Jun Wang
  • Wei Wang
  • Wenyu Wang

Abstract

Constructing a comprehensive data set of financially distressed firms that restructured their debts from 2000–2014, we find that firms with financial institutions’ loan-equity simultaneous holdings are more likely to restructure out of court than to file for bankruptcy. The effect is stronger when loans are oversecured and when the expected bankruptcy costs are larger. We use mergers of financial institutions and instrumental variable estimations to address potential endogeneity concerns. Firms with simultaneous holdings experience higher stock returns. The evidence suggests that mitigating shareholder-creditor conflict results in cost-effective resolutions of financial distress.

Suggested Citation

  • Yongqiang Chu & Ha Diep-Nguyen & Jun Wang & Wei Wang & Wenyu Wang, 2025. "Shareholder-Creditor Conflict and the Resolution of Financial Distress," The Review of Corporate Finance Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 14(3), pages 804-838.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:rcorpf:v:14:y:2025:i:3:p:804-838.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/rcfs/cfae005
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • G20 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - General
    • G30 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - General
    • G33 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Bankruptcy; Liquidation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:rcorpf:v:14:y:2025:i:3:p:804-838.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/rcfs .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.