IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/rasset/v8y2018i1p153-182..html

A Performance Comparison of Large-n Factor Estimators

Author

Listed:
  • Zhuo Chen
  • Gregory Connor
  • Robert A Korajczyk

Abstract

We evaluate the performance of various methods for estimating factor returns in an approximate factor model. Differences across estimators are most pronounced when there is cross-sectional heteroscedasticity or when cross-sectional sample sizes, n, have fewer than 4,000 assets. Estimators incorporating either cross-sectional or time-series heteroscedasticity outperform the other estimators when those types of heteroscedasticity are present. The differences are most pronounced when the cross-sectional sample is small.Received December 2, 2015; editorial decision May 16, 2017 by Editor Jeffrey Pontiff.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhuo Chen & Gregory Connor & Robert A Korajczyk, 2018. "A Performance Comparison of Large-n Factor Estimators," The Review of Asset Pricing Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 8(1), pages 153-182.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:rasset:v:8:y:2018:i:1:p:153-182.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/rapstu/rax017
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version below or

    for a different version of it.

    Other versions of this item:

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:rasset:v:8:y:2018:i:1:p:153-182.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/raps .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.