IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/qjecon/v140y2025i4p3191-3231..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sexual Harassment in Public Spaces and Police Patrols: Experimental Evidence from Urban India

Author

Listed:
  • Sofia Amaral
  • Girija Borker
  • Nathan Fiala
  • Anjani Kumar
  • Nishith Prakash
  • Maria Micaela Sviatschi

Abstract

We conduct a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effect of an innovative police patrol program on sexual harassment in public spaces in Hyderabad, India. In collaboration with the Hyderabad City Police, we randomize exposure to police patrols and the visibility of officers by deploying both uniformed and undercover officers across 350 hot spots. To assess the effect, we implement a novel, high-frequency observation exercise to measure sexual harassment at these hot spots, where enumerators recorded all observed instances of sexual harassment and women’s responses in real time. We find that although police patrols had no effect on overall street harassment, uniformed police patrols reduced severe forms of harassment (forceful touching, intimidation) by 27% and reduced the likelihood of women leaving the hot spot due to sexual harassment. We uncovered the underlying mechanisms and found that both police visibility and officers’ attitudes toward sexual harassment are key to understanding its incidence.

Suggested Citation

  • Sofia Amaral & Girija Borker & Nathan Fiala & Anjani Kumar & Nishith Prakash & Maria Micaela Sviatschi, 2025. "Sexual Harassment in Public Spaces and Police Patrols: Experimental Evidence from Urban India," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 140(4), pages 3191-3231.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:qjecon:v:140:y:2025:i:4:p:3191-3231.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/qje/qjaf026
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:qjecon:v:140:y:2025:i:4:p:3191-3231.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/qje .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.