IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/qjecon/v140y2025i4p2749-2804..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Investor Memory and Biased Beliefs: Evidence from the Field

Author

Listed:
  • Zhengyang Jiang
  • Hongqi Liu
  • Cameron Peng
  • Hongjun Yan

Abstract

We survey a large, representative sample of retail investors in China to elicit their memories of stock market investments and their return expectations. We merge these survey data with administrative transaction data to test a model in which investors selectively recall past experiences to form their beliefs. Our analysis uncovers new facts about investor memory and highlights similarity-based recall as a key mechanism of belief formation in financial markets. A rising market prompts investors to recall their past experiences more positively, leading to more optimistic forecasts of future returns. Recalled experiences can explain cross-investor variation in return expectations and, in our setting, dominate actual experiences in their explanatory power. In the transaction data, we confirm that recalled experiences are reflected in investors’ trading decisions through a belief channel.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhengyang Jiang & Hongqi Liu & Cameron Peng & Hongjun Yan, 2025. "Investor Memory and Biased Beliefs: Evidence from the Field," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 140(4), pages 2749-2804.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:qjecon:v:140:y:2025:i:4:p:2749-2804.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/qje/qjaf035
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:qjecon:v:140:y:2025:i:4:p:2749-2804.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/qje .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.