IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/qjecon/v140y2025i3p2269-2328..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Lives Versus Livelihoods: The Impact of the Great Recession on Mortality and Welfare

Author

Listed:
  • Amy Finkelstein
  • Matthew J Notowidigdo
  • Frank Schilbach
  • Jonathan Zhang

Abstract

We leverage spatial variation in the severity of the Great Recession across the United States to examine its impact on mortality and explore the quantitative implications. We estimate that an increase in the unemployment rate of the magnitude of the Great Recession reduces the average annual age-adjusted mortality rate by 2.3%, with effects persisting for at least 10 years. Mortality reductions appear across causes of death and are concentrated in the half of the population with a high school degree or less. We estimate similar percentage reductions in mortality at all ages, with declines in elderly mortality thus responsible for about three-quarters of the total mortality reduction. Recession-induced mortality declines are driven primarily by external effects of reduced aggregate economic activity on mortality, and reduced air pollution appears to be a quantitatively important mechanism. Incorporating our estimates of procyclical mortality into a standard macroeconomic framework substantially reduces the welfare costs of recessions, particularly for people with less education, and at older ages.

Suggested Citation

  • Amy Finkelstein & Matthew J Notowidigdo & Frank Schilbach & Jonathan Zhang, 2025. "Lives Versus Livelihoods: The Impact of the Great Recession on Mortality and Welfare," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 140(3), pages 2269-2328.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:qjecon:v:140:y:2025:i:3:p:2269-2328.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/qje/qjaf023
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:qjecon:v:140:y:2025:i:3:p:2269-2328.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/qje .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.