IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/qjecon/v131y2016i4p1875-1926..html

Earthquakes, Religion, and Transition to Self-Government in ItalianCities

Author

Listed:
  • Marianna Belloc
  • Francesco Drago
  • Roberto Galbiati

Abstract

This article presents a unique historical experiment to explore the dynamics ofinstitutional change in the Middle Ages. We have assembled a novel data set,where information on political institutions for northern central Italian citiesbetween 1000 and 1300 is matched with detailed information on the earthquakesthat occurred in the area and period of interest. Exploiting the panel structureof the data, we document that the occurrence of an earthquake retardedinstitutional transition from autocratic regimes to self-government (thecommune) in cities where the political and the religious leaders were the sameperson (episcopal see cities), but not in cities where political and religiouspowers were distinct (non–episcopal see cities). Such differential effect holdsfor destructive seismic episodes and for events that were felt by the populationbut did not cause any material damage to persons or objects. Ancillary resultsshow that seismic events provoked a positive and statistically significantdifferential effect on the construction and further ornamentation of religiousbuildings between episcopal and non–episcopal see cities. Our findings areconsistent with the idea that earthquakes, interpreted in the Middle Ages asmanifestation of the will and outrage of God, represented a shock to people’sreligious beliefs and, as a consequence, enhanced the ability ofpolitical-religious leaders to restore social order after a crisis relative tothe emerging communal institutions. This interpretation is supported byhistorical evidence.

Suggested Citation

  • Marianna Belloc & Francesco Drago & Roberto Galbiati, 2016. "Earthquakes, Religion, and Transition to Self-Government in ItalianCities," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 131(4), pages 1875-1926.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:qjecon:v:131:y:2016:i:4:p:1875-1926.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/qje/qjw020
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version below or

    for a different version of it.

    Other versions of this item:

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • D02 - Microeconomics - - General - - - Institutions: Design, Formation, Operations, and Impact
    • D72 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - Political Processes: Rent-seeking, Lobbying, Elections, Legislatures, and Voting Behavior
    • D74 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - Conflict; Conflict Resolution; Alliances; Revolutions
    • P16 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Capitalist Economies - - - Capitalist Institutions; Welfare State
    • Z12 - Other Special Topics - - Cultural Economics - - - Religion

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:qjecon:v:131:y:2016:i:4:p:1875-1926.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/qje .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.