IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/publus/v56y2026i1p226-247..html

From Variables to Mechanisms in Federalism Research

Author

Listed:
  • Scott L Greer

Abstract

Federalism merits attention because of how it affects things that matter—outcomes as fundamental as democracy and the welfare state. This article critiques the common, variable-based approach to understanding federalism’s impact, arguing that it violates multiple rules of good inference such as the number and independence of cases or consistent variable coding. It then proposes an alternative, case-based approach that tries to understand cases as constituted by the interactions of variables (mechanisms) rather than as opportunities to identify the impact of single variables. It shows the method in the abstract, using a hierarchy of variables to understand the development of the welfare state in federations with illustrations from the United States. The impact of federalism and interesting research questions, become clearer by examining the mechanisms at work in its interaction with other variables in a concrete case.

Suggested Citation

  • Scott L Greer, 2026. "From Variables to Mechanisms in Federalism Research," Publius: The Journal of Federalism, CSF Associates Inc., vol. 56(1), pages 226-247.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:publus:v:56:y:2026:i:1:p:226-247.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/publius/pjaf073
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:publus:v:56:y:2026:i:1:p:226-247.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/publius .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.