IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/publus/v56y2026i1p185-204..html

Federalism and Polarization: How Can Research Be More Relevant?

Author

Listed:
  • Carol S Weissert

Abstract

In the United States, rising partisan polarization both affects and is affected by federalism. Yet federalism scholars have not convincingly addressed whether federalism exacerbates or mitigates polarization, even though these linkages have numerous implications for the future of democracy. Hindering research on these questions is a combination of rapid political change, inadequate data, and limited existing theoretical frameworks. Policymakers also display limited receptivity to impartial, evidence-based research on such politically charged issues. This article outlines these theoretical and empirical challenges and offers suggestions for building on current research strengths to enhance the relevance of federalism research.

Suggested Citation

  • Carol S Weissert, 2026. "Federalism and Polarization: How Can Research Be More Relevant?," Publius: The Journal of Federalism, CSF Associates Inc., vol. 56(1), pages 185-204.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:publus:v:56:y:2026:i:1:p:185-204.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/publius/pjaf060
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:publus:v:56:y:2026:i:1:p:185-204.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/publius .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.