IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/publus/v56y2026i1p155-184..html

US Federalism and the Political Economy of Territorial Status: Evidence from Puerto Rico

Author

Listed:
  • Mariely López-Santana

Abstract

How should we understand the uniquely ambiguous status of the unincorporated territories in the context of US federalism? Focusing on the case of Puerto Rico (PR), this article argues that its unique status stems from two distinct logics of governance: territorial differentiation in the socio-political realm versus integration in the economic space. In the socio-political realm, as well as in the area of taxation, the unincorporated territories remain “foreign to the United States in the domestic sense.” In contrast, these asymmetries do not fully apply to the realm of markets, as the free flow of goods, capital, and people between PR and the fifty states has been mostly guaranteed since the early twentieth century. The debt crisis of the twenty-first century shows how these two logics collided. The article concludes by outlining a research agenda on the political economy of unincorporated territories as part of the US federal system.

Suggested Citation

  • Mariely López-Santana, 2026. "US Federalism and the Political Economy of Territorial Status: Evidence from Puerto Rico," Publius: The Journal of Federalism, CSF Associates Inc., vol. 56(1), pages 155-184.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:publus:v:56:y:2026:i:1:p:155-184.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/publius/pjaf069
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:publus:v:56:y:2026:i:1:p:155-184.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/publius .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.