IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/publus/v56y2026i1p125-154..html

Who Benefits From Federalism Claims in Federal Court?

Author

Listed:
  • Lisa L Miller

Abstract

Debates about the virtues or vices of American-style federalism are as old as the Republic. While scholars generally agree that American federalism facilitates multiple levels of political contestation, there is less agreement on the democratic implications of these multiple battlegrounds. This article focuses on an area that receives little attention among American politics scholars: federalism claims against national authority in federal courts. Situating American federalism within a larger framework of veto opportunities, this article analyzes challenges to congressional authority on federalism grounds in landmark Supreme Court cases from 1800 to 2018. Contrary to the standard legal narratives about federalism’s virtues, the most frequent beneficiaries of legal claims against congressional authority on federalism grounds appear to be economic elites challenging national economic regulation, taxation, and labor protections. A smaller, but substantial set of cases involves opponents of equal protection and other anti-discrimination laws. These findings have important implications for national democratic responsiveness and standard legal analyses of federalism’s democratic promise.

Suggested Citation

  • Lisa L Miller, 2026. "Who Benefits From Federalism Claims in Federal Court?," Publius: The Journal of Federalism, CSF Associates Inc., vol. 56(1), pages 125-154.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:publus:v:56:y:2026:i:1:p:125-154.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/publius/pjaf061
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:publus:v:56:y:2026:i:1:p:125-154.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/publius .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.