IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/publus/v55y2025i2p353-378..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Explaining State Allocation Shares Under the Water Quality Act of 1987: Politics, Incrementalism, or Need?

Author

Listed:
  • John C Morris
  • Joseph Aistrup
  • Zoe Nemerever
  • Xiodan Zhang

Abstract

What is the basis of the allocation of federal funding for wastewater treatment infrastructure? The Water Quality Act of 1987 changed the ways in which the national government helped to offset the costs of compliance with the Clean Water Act by changing the scheme to allocate grant funds to states. However, the available literature provides no clues as to how the allocations for each state were determined. Our model to predict state shares under the 1987 legislation includes policy need and population; we also include variables to represent each state’s influence in the House and Senate committees. We find that the most likely explanation for the 1987 allocation is incrementalism, although small-state representation on the Senate committee is positively correlated with higher allocation amounts. This research contributes to our understanding of federal legislative funding allocation formulae, particularly for environmental infrastructure programs.

Suggested Citation

  • John C Morris & Joseph Aistrup & Zoe Nemerever & Xiodan Zhang, 2025. "Explaining State Allocation Shares Under the Water Quality Act of 1987: Politics, Incrementalism, or Need?," Publius: The Journal of Federalism, CSF Associates Inc., vol. 55(2), pages 353-378.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:publus:v:55:y:2025:i:2:p:353-378.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/publius/pjae045
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:publus:v:55:y:2025:i:2:p:353-378.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/publius .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.