IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/publus/v55y2025i2p281-324..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing the Implementation of ARPA Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds: The View from City Officials

Author

Listed:
  • Laiyang Ke
  • Eunjoo Kwon
  • Minji Hong
  • Benedict Jimenez

Abstract

The 2021 American Rescue Plan Act created the Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF), which provided $350 billion for state and local governments to aid with pandemic recovery efforts. This research examines the local implementation of SLFRF from the point of view of city officials. We assess the effectiveness of grant implementation on two dimensions: funding allocation (the ease or difficulty of selecting and prioritizing projects to be funded) and project management (the ability to complete projects on time and within budget). Our research focuses on the contributions of three general groups of factors on grant implementation performance: federal control and oversight, local capacities, and the role of local political actors. We conducted a national survey of cities that received SLFRF grants and gathered information from city officials responsible for administering the grant on different aspects of SLFRF implementation. Using ordinary least squares and ordered logit regressions to analyze the survey data, the empirical results uncover some consistent patterns. Specifically, local management discretion, perceived clarity of federal rules, a centralized local grant administration structure, and mayoral involvement are positively associated with grant implementation effectiveness.

Suggested Citation

  • Laiyang Ke & Eunjoo Kwon & Minji Hong & Benedict Jimenez, 2025. "Assessing the Implementation of ARPA Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds: The View from City Officials," Publius: The Journal of Federalism, CSF Associates Inc., vol. 55(2), pages 281-324.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:publus:v:55:y:2025:i:2:p:281-324.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/publius/pjae051
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:publus:v:55:y:2025:i:2:p:281-324.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/publius .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.