IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/publus/v55y2025i1p201-221..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Territorial Conflict in the Spotlight: Unveiling Paths to Territorial Clarity

Author

Listed:
  • Marc Sanjaume-Calvet
  • Lesley-Ann Daniels
  • Pau Bossacoma Busquets

Abstract

The tensions between centralization and autonomy inherent in territorial conflicts can give rise to entrenched positions and stalemate. This Federalism Monitor article describes an attempt in Catalonia to find new ways to resolve the Spanish-Catalan conflict over self-determination, which culminated in a referendum and unilateral declaration of independence in 2017, followed by a backlash by the central authorities, including the suspension of political autonomy. We summarize the context, contents, and potential impact of the Report on the Clarity Agreement (2024). Our analysis draws on our experiences as members of the plural and independent council of academic experts appointed by the Catalan Government to produce the report. This experience, we argue, can guide and inspire other experiences of conflict resolution by offering a description and analysis of this case, which has many generalizable features.

Suggested Citation

  • Marc Sanjaume-Calvet & Lesley-Ann Daniels & Pau Bossacoma Busquets, 2025. "Territorial Conflict in the Spotlight: Unveiling Paths to Territorial Clarity," Publius: The Journal of Federalism, CSF Associates Inc., vol. 55(1), pages 201-221.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:publus:v:55:y:2025:i:1:p:201-221.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/publius/pjae023
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:publus:v:55:y:2025:i:1:p:201-221.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/publius .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.