IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/publus/v55y2025i1p147-173..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Between Decentralization and Asymmetry: Explaining Preferences toward the Division of Power in Canada

Author

Listed:
  • Philippe Chassé
  • Olivier Jacques
  • Colin Scott

Abstract

In most federations, the division of power between central and subnational governments represents an important cleavage dividing voters and structuring party systems. Yet we lack a robust body of research regarding individuals’ preferences for different forms of devolved decision-making such as decentralization and asymmetrical federalism. This article contributes to this research agenda by analyzing the effects of identity and grievances on public opinion toward the division of powers in Canada. Leveraging four waves of the Confederation of Tomorrow survey, we find that respondents who identify predominantly with their province are more likely to prefer decentralization and asymmetrical federalism, whereas those who hold grievances against the federation prefer decentralization. Studying provincial variations in the impact of our main variables, we point to the role of the political context by showing that in certain provinces, the political mobilization of grievances strengthens the relationship between provincial identity and support for decentralization.

Suggested Citation

  • Philippe Chassé & Olivier Jacques & Colin Scott, 2025. "Between Decentralization and Asymmetry: Explaining Preferences toward the Division of Power in Canada," Publius: The Journal of Federalism, CSF Associates Inc., vol. 55(1), pages 147-173.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:publus:v:55:y:2025:i:1:p:147-173.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/publius/pjae034
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:publus:v:55:y:2025:i:1:p:147-173.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/publius .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.