IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/publus/v52y2022i4p525-552..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dual versus Administrative Federalism: Origins and Evolution of Two Models
[What can federalism teach us about the European Union? The German experience]

Author

Listed:
  • Sean Mueller
  • Alan Fenna

Abstract

Federations have traditionally divided powers either along policy lines, in which case a dual system results, or along functional lines with the central government legislating and the constituent units implementing, in which case a system of administrative federalism results. Although this distinction is widely used, we know little of its specific origins, the degree to which it accurately portrays federal practice today, or even its implications. This article examines the origins and traces the evolution of these two models in six federations since their formation: the United States, Switzerland, Canada, Australia, Germany, and India. Two questions are addressed. First, what explains the choice for either the one or the other type, and is administrative federalism really sui generis to Germany, as often argued in the literature? And second, how have they evolved over time and has there been a convergence?

Suggested Citation

  • Sean Mueller & Alan Fenna, 2022. "Dual versus Administrative Federalism: Origins and Evolution of Two Models [What can federalism teach us about the European Union? The German experience]," Publius: The Journal of Federalism, CSF Associates Inc., vol. 52(4), pages 525-552.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:publus:v:52:y:2022:i:4:p:525-552.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/publius/pjac008
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:publus:v:52:y:2022:i:4:p:525-552.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/publius .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.